CarnotecniaFood technology
Compound feed

Compound feed for poultry and swine: formulated on digestible amino acids, not on the percentage on the bag

Most mills still buy and sell feed on the protein percentage printed on the bag. No animal consumes that number: the animal consumes digestible amino acids and metabolisable energy. Formulating on crude protein means paying for nitrogen that ends up in the litter, spending the animal’s energy on excreting it and losing points of feed conversion that never show up in the analysis of the finished product.

Formulation per 1 t of broiler grower feed — guidance ranges on a maize-soya basis

ComponentAmountWhy it is there
Yellow maizeMajor componentSupplies the bulk of the energy and the starch that binds the pellet. Overdosed, the diet runs short of amino acids and synthetics have to be forced; short, you move into more fibrous sources that lower the energy.
Soybean mealSecond fractionMain source of digestible lysine. Toasting decides its value: too short a process leaves trypsin inhibitors; too long a process blocks the lysine. Proximate analysis does not tell the two cases apart.
Fat or oilAccording to the target energyEnergy density, dust control and die lubrication. In excess applied in the mixer, pellet hardness drops; the upper fraction is better applied after the cooler.
Digestible phosphorus sourceDepends on the phytase and its matrixThe range is wide because it depends on the phytase used and on its declared matrix. Overdosing raises the calcium, precipitates phosphorus and zinc, and reduces the efficacy of the enzyme itself.
Calcium carbonateLow dose, for fine adjustmentCloses the calcium and its ratio to digestible phosphorus. A small excess raises the pH of the upper tract and depresses fat digestion and phytate phosphorus release: the cheap mistake that turns out expensive.
Salt, bicarbonate and chlorideLow doseThey set the electrolyte balance. With low sodium, intake and growth fall; with excess sodium or potassium, wet litter and footpad dermatitis show up before any nutritional symptom.
Synthetic amino acidsLow dose, high impactThey allow one or two points of crude protein to be cut without losing performance, closing the ideal protein. If methionine is short the bird eats more to cover it and feed conversion is lost; past the point where the next amino acid becomes limiting, the saving stops dead.
Premix, enzymes and additivesTracePhytase must be discounted from the inorganic phosphate, never counted twice, and its matrix is only valid with the calcium under control.
Phase targets, not ingredientsThis is what you formulate toMetabolisable energy, digestible lysine, methionine plus cystine, threonine, calcium and digestible phosphorus. The values are to be checked against the current manual of the genetic line: the ratios to lysine matter more than the absolute figures, because one amino acid in excess does not make up for another in deficit.
Process

Step by step, with the temperatures.

01

Actually analyse the raw material

Moisture, protein and profile by NIR calibrated against wet chemistry, and mycotoxins according to the risk of the harvest. Without per-lot analysis the matrix is fiction and every calculated saving is theoretical. Variability between harvests moves more cost than any purchasing negotiation.

02

Grind

600 to 800 microns geometric mean diameter for a pelleted broiler diet. Finer improves conditioning but raises power consumption and, in excess, impairs gizzard development; coarser gives a soft pellet and fines.

03

Batch

Macro ingredients within ±0.5 % and micro ingredients on an independent scale to ±0.1 %. A micro batching error is invisible in the finished product analysis and is paid for in full in the field.

04

Mix

90 to 180 seconds dry depending on mixer design, with the liquids after the point of homogeneity. The criterion is a coefficient of variation below 5 %, validated with a tracer and rechecked after every paddle change. A coefficient of 15 % means some animals eat the premix and others do not.

05

Condition

Dry steam at 80 – 85 °C for 30 to 60 seconds, with the mash at 16 – 17 % moisture. Heat and moisture gelatinise the starch, which is the real pellet binder. With wet steam you add water without heat and the pellet comes out soft even though the thermometer reads right.

06

Pellet

Die ratio of 10:1 to 12:1 for a 3.0 – 3.5 mm pellet, stable amperage and product leaving at 80 – 88 °C. Compaction depends on that ratio and on the conditioning, not on forcing the feeder.

07

Cool

8 to 12 minutes down to ambient plus 5 – 8 °C, with final moisture below 12.5 %. Cooling too fast cracks the pellet and creates fines; cooling too little leaves hot product that condenses in the silo and goes mouldy.

08

Apply after the pellet and control fines

Fine fat and heat-labile additives go after the cooler, because conditioning degrades them. Screening with fines below 10 % and a retention sample per batch: with no sample kept there is no way to reconstruct a field problem.

Control pointValue
Mixing coefficient of variationBelow 5 %, with a tracer
Geometric mean diameter of grinding600 – 800 microns
Conditioning80 – 85 °C for 30 – 60 s with dry steam
Pellet durabilityAbove 90 %, always stating the method
Fines measured at the feeder, not at the millBelow 10 %
Moisture and water activity of the finished feedBelow 12.5 % and below 0.65
Mycotoxins and SalmonellaMethods, frequency and limits according to the regulations in force in the country
Troubleshooting

What went wrong, and why.

Half the craft is reading the defect. These are the ones that keep coming back.

What you seeWhat caused it
The pellet leaves the mill sound and reaches the house broken upInsufficient gelatinisation from wet steam or cold conditioning, excess fat in the mixer, or a worn die. Dry the steam, move the fat to after the pellet and measure die wear.
Low output and the motor runs hotA die too long for a formula low in starch and high in fibre, or a badly conditioned mash. Adjust the die ratio to the real formula and increase retention in the conditioner.
They eat well but feed conversion does not improveIdeal protein imbalance, or a digestible matrix overestimated on a variable ingredient, typically a meal with toasting out of specification. High crude protein masks the deficit. Analyse the amino acids of the lot and reformulate on ratios to lysine.
Wet litter and dermatitis with no apparent diseaseExcess crude protein, whose surplus nitrogen is excreted with water, or a deviated electrolyte balance. Cut the protein leaning on synthetics and recalculate the balance.
The premix shows up in one bag and not in the nextSegregation from differences in particle size and density between the carrier and the rest, short mixing time or overmixing after the liquids. Carrier with particle size similar to the diet and validation of the coefficient of variation.
The feed crusts the silo and mould appearsIt left the cooler hot or with moisture above 13 %, and the day-to-night temperature difference condenses on the wall. Close down the cooling and control moisture and water activity per batch.
Frequently asked

What people ask before they start.

Why does a 19 % protein feed convert better than a 21 % one?

Because the animal has no crude protein requirement: it has a requirement for digestible amino acids in a given proportion, which is what is called ideal protein. A badly balanced 21 % wastes the most abundant amino acid up to the limit set by the scarcest, and the excess nitrogen is excreted at an energy cost. A 19 % with the profile closed on digestible lysine covers the requirement with less raw material.

How much does formulating on digestibles instead of on crude protein cut the cost?

It cuts it two ways: expensive protein is replaced with synthetic amino acids where it pays, and feed conversion is recovered. The size of it depends on local prices and on the real matrix of the mill, and it is calculated with your own optimisation. Any saving percentage quoted without those figures is advertising, not engineering.

How far can I cut crude protein with synthetics?

Until the next limiting amino acid becomes restrictive. In poultry, after methionine and lysine come threonine, valine and isoleucine; in pigs the order changes with the stage. At that point the saving stops and cutting further costs performance. It demands a reliable digestible matrix and control of the electrolyte balance.

Can I use the same formula in another region?

No. The maize, the meal, the available by-products, the ambient temperature and above all the relative prices all change. Least-cost formulation is local by definition: it is recalculated with the inputs the customer has to hand and with the analysis of those inputs, not with the ones in the manual.

Does phytase replace inorganic phosphate?

It releases part of the phytate phosphorus in the plant material, with a declared matrix that must be discounted from the phosphate, never added on top. Its efficacy falls when calcium is high, because calcium precipitates the phytate and competes for the substrate. If the carbonate is raised without recalculating, you pay for the enzyme and never collect the benefit.

Contact

Ask us from wherever you are

We answer in English, Spanish, Portuguese, French, Italian and Arabic. If your question is technical and specific, so is the answer.

This opens your mail app with the message ready to send. You can also write directly to direccion@carnotecnia.com